Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
ams Sensors USA Inc. v. Intersil Corporation
Case Number:
4:08-cv-00451
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bragalone Olejko
- Cole Schotz
- Dechert LLP
- Foley & Lardner
- Jones Day
- Morrison Foerster
- Munck Wilson
- Munsch Hardt
- Nelson Bumgardner
- Scheef & Stone
- Sharp Law LLP
- Shore Firm
- Siebman Law
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 27, 2020
EDTX Judge Orders New Damages Trial In $59M Lighting Fight
A Texas federal court on Friday ordered a new damages trial in a patent and trade secrets dispute over light sensors after finding that the Federal Circuit's decision to wipe out a $59 million verdict for a Texas lighting company meant that it cannot yet enter final judgment on a remaining claim.
-
October 01, 2019
Lighting Co. Can't Ban Rival Products After Axed $59M Award
A Texas federal judge on Tuesday refused a light sensor company's request to permanently ban a competitor from selling products that infringed its patent, finding that a single lost sale was not enough to justify the ban.
-
April 26, 2016
Texas Jury's $89M Verdict In Patent, Trade Secrets Row Cut
A Texas light sensor company on Tuesday lost $11.8 million from the $88.86 million a federal jury awarded it in its patent infringement and trade secrets case, but also managed to duck a new trial in the Eastern District of Texas.
-
April 25, 2016
Judge Won't Bar Light Sensor Sales After $89M Jury Verdict
A Texas federal judge on Friday declined to permanently bar a power management company from selling light sensor products that a jury found infringe a rival's patent in a $88.86 million verdict, ordering the two entities to instead negotiate a running royalty rate for future sales.
-
January 19, 2016
CORRECTED: Light Sensor Co. Says Rival Still Selling Infringing Products
A Texas light sensor company that last year won a $58.7 million jury verdict in a patent infringement and trade secrets suit on Tuesday told a Texas federal judge its direct competitor’s bad behavior merits a permanent injunction that would stop sales of infringing products. Correction: An earlier story incorrectly stated the amount of the jury verdict. The error has been corrected.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →