Ushijima v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

  1. July 30, 2015

    Baker Botts Denied $3.5M Atty Fees In Samsung IP Row

    Baker Botts LLP lost a bid for $3.5 million in attorneys' fees after a Texas federal judge ruled on Thursday that the firm failed to show the case was exceptional, despite securing a jury verdict that its client, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., didn't infringe a Japanese inventor's patent.

  2. June 24, 2015

    Inventor Strikes Back At Samsung's $3.5M Attorney Fee Bid

    An inventor who lost a patent infringement suit against Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. said Tuesday the company's lawyers at Baker Botts LLP can't recover $3.5 million in attorneys' fees because he litigated the claims in good faith and survived early attempts to dismiss his claims.

  3. June 16, 2015

    Baker Botts Wants $3.5M In Fees In Samsung LCD Patent Case

    Baker Botts LLP attorneys on Tuesday sought about $3.5 million in attorneys' fees after a Texas federal jury found that their client, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., didn't infringe a patent covering liquid crystal display backlight inverter circuit technology, arguing that the plaintiff pursued claims that were held to be outside the scope of his patent.

  4. March 04, 2015

    Jury Grants Samsung Win In LCD Circuit Technology Row

    A Texas federal jury on Tuesday found that Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. did not infringe a patent held by a Japanese inventor covering liquid crystal display backlight inverter circuit technology.