Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. Tessera, Inc.
Case Number:
5:12-cv-01827
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
June 22, 2016
Insurer Must Defend Tessera In Patent Row, Court Says
A California federal judge on Wednesday ordered St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. to defend Tessera Inc. in a lawsuit alleging it breached a patent licensing agreement, determining that a policy exclusion for violations of intellectual property rights doesn't apply because the underlying action doesn't implicate patent laws.
-
May 16, 2016
Insurer Can't Escape Defense Of Patent Row, Tessera Says
Tessera Inc. told a California federal court Monday that an exclusion in a St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. policy for claims over violations of intellectual property rights doesn't free the insurer from defending it in a lawsuit alleging it breached a patent licensing agreement, arguing that the underlying suit doesn't implicate patent laws.