Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Khasin v. R. C. Bigelow, Inc.
Case Number:
4:12-cv-02204
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 11, 2016
Tea Drinkers Hit Back At Bigelow's Bid To End Antioxidant Suit
A tea drinker who claims Bigelow misled him on its labels about the amount of antioxidants in its teas fought the company's bid for a quick win Friday, telling a California federal judge that the company's alleged lies — which he maintains he relied on when deciding to purchase the herbal beverage — are not protected by free speech laws.
-
May 03, 2012
Bigelow In Hot Water Over Tea's Antioxidant Claims
R.C. Bigelow Inc. was hit with a putative class action Wednesday in California federal court alleging the tea company made illegal and misleading health claims about antioxidants even after other tea makers were warned by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration about similar claims.