Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Ellsworth v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Case Number:
3:12-cv-02506
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Berger Montague
- Buckley LLP
- Carlton Fields
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Faegre Drinker
- Nichols Kaster
- Sheppard Mullin
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 24, 2015
US Bank Settles Suit Over Force-Placed Flood Insurance
A California federal judge on Thursday granted preliminary approval to a class action settlement between U.S. Bank NA, American Security Insurance Co. and plaintiffs who claim the bank charged homeowners lender-placed flood insurance rates inflated by kickbacks and policy backdating.
-
June 16, 2014
US Bank Borrowers Get Cert. In Force-Placed Flood Policy Suit
A California federal judge on Friday certified a class action brought against U.S. Bank NA for allegedly charging homeowners force-placed flood insurance rates that were inflated by improper kickbacks and policy backdating, also rejecting the bank's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
-
March 24, 2014
US Bank, Insurer Stuck In Force-Placed Insurance Suit
A California magistrate judge on Friday preserved a putative class action accusing U.S. Bank NA of charging homeowners force-placed flood insurance rates that were inflated by improper kickbacks and policy backdating, ripping a "predatory" attempt to moot the case through settlement offers.