January 07, 2016
Barnes & Noble took a second shot at tossing a proposed class action involving oversold tablets on Wednesday, telling a California federal court the latest iteration of the online shopper's claims still fail to show how he was harmed when he ordered a product the retailer had run out of.
November 06, 2015
Barnes & Noble urged a California federal court Thursday to sanction the lead plaintiff in a proposed class action claiming the retailer misled customers by letting them order cut-rate tablets that didn't exist, arguing he's a practicing attorney who should know better than to throw out evidence.
October 16, 2015
Shoppers who claim Barnes & Noble misled them by letting them order cut-rate tablets that didn't exist told a California federal court on Thursday the bookseller's attack on their class certification bid focused on issues "largely irrelevant" to the suit.
September 18, 2015
Barnes & Noble Inc. tried to fend off a bid for class certification in a suit accusing the company of misleading customers into buying heavily discounted Hewlett-Packard Co. tablets only to cancel their orders hours later after a supply shortage, telling a California federal judge Thursday the proposed class members were "overwhelmingly" unharmed.
February 20, 2015
A California federal judge denied Barnes & Noble's bid to transfer to New York a putative class action claiming it misled customers into buying discounted Hewlett-Packard Co. tablets, only to cancel their orders within hours, saying the lead plaintiff is located in the state where the retailer also has a number of stores.
October 19, 2012
A California federal judge ruled Thursday in a proposed class action that Barnes & Noble Inc. must provide information on customers who tried to buy discounted Hewlett-Packard Co. tablets on the bookseller's website only to have their orders canceled, allegedly in violation of false advertising and contract laws.