Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Bergstrom, Inc. v. Idle Free Systems, Inc.
Case Number:
3:12-cv-50254
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
March 13, 2014
How They Won It: Foley Puts Bergstrom AC Patent On Ice
The patent team at Foley & Lardner LLP entered untested waters to sink a Bergstrom Inc. air conditioning patent under a largely new proceeding at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in January, leaving in its wake a dauntingly lofty standard for innovators to amend their patents during litigation.
-
January 10, 2014
USPTO Sets High Bar For Amending Claims In AIA Reviews
In what is believed to be the second decision on the merits in an inter partes review, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office invalidated a Bergstrom Inc. air conditioning patent Tuesday and set rules making it tough to amend patent claims in the new proceedings.