Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Nautilus Insurance Company v. Strongwell Corporation
Case Number:
1:12-cv-00038
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 06, 2013
Nautilus' Effort To Avoid Strongwell Defense Nixed By Judge
A federal judge in Virginia held that a lawsuit claiming Strongwell Corp. supplied defective materials for power plant projects triggers Nautilus Insurance Co.'s duty to defend, nixing a slew of the insurer's arguments against defense coverage, including that there was no "occurrence."
-
July 13, 2012
Nautilus Seeks To Duck Coverage In Reactor Defect Suit
Nautilus Insurance Co. asked a Virginia federal court on Friday to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Strongwell Corp. in a suit over its allegedly faulty work on power plant projects, saying the poorly performed work was not an accident as required by the insurance policy.