Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Nicole Cummings v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Case Number:
2:12-cv-06345
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 08, 2014
Court Can't Weigh Damages At Class Stage, Ex-Barista Says
A former Starbucks employee who brought a putative wage class action against the company asked a California federal court on Monday to reconsider its decision to deny class certification, saying the court weighed potential damages in the case before ruling on liability in contravention of the state high court's Brinker ruling.
-
March 24, 2014
Starbucks Baristas Lose Class Cert. Bid In Wage Action
A California federal judge on Monday refused to certify four proposed classes in a suit alleging Starbucks Corp. did not allow for required rest breaks or meal periods, finding that each of the proposed classes were overinclusive.
-
May 14, 2013
Starbucks Gets Ex-Barista's Wage Suit Clipped
A California federal judge on Tuesday trimmed a proposed class action alleging Starbucks Corp. failed to pay proper regular and overtime wages by rounding down the hours employees worked, finding the claims either weren't proven or were time-barred.