Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Ellis et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Case Number:
4:12-cv-03897
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Baron & Budd
- Cossich Sumich
- Covington & Burling
- Kingsmill Riess
- Morgan Lewis
- Schlee Huber
- Sideman & Bancroft
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 01, 2015
JPMorgan, Citi Mortgagors Seek Cert. In Inspection Fees Row
Citibank NA and JPMorgan Chase & Co. mortgage borrowers urged a California federal judge on Tuesday to certify a nationwide class of millions of homeowners whom the banks allegedly charged unnecessary fees for property inspections when their loans were in default.
-
August 18, 2015
Chase Says Homeowners' New Evidence Was Too Late
JPMorgan Chase & Co. on Monday objected to 11 pieces of evidence submitted by California class action plaintiffs accusing the bank of fraudulently charging homeowners millions in unnecessary property inspection fees, saying new evidence can't be considered if it's first presented in a reply.
-
August 11, 2015
Chase's Lapses Can't Deflect Class Cert., Homeowners Say
Plaintiffs accusing JPMorgan Chase & Co. of committing fraud by uniformly charging homeowners millions of dollars in unnecessary property inspection fees told a California federal court Monday that the bank cannot use its past failings to deny class certification.
-
September 30, 2014
Citibank, Chase Borrowers' RICO Class Actions In Jeopardy
A California federal judge on Tuesday cast doubt on a pair of proposed class actions accusing Citibank NA and JPMorgan Chase & Co. of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act by charging property-inspection fees to mortgage borrowers in default, saying she didn't think their inspection fee policies amounted to racketeering.
-
June 14, 2013
JPMorgan Mortgage Fee Fraud Suit Not Barred By Settlement
A federal judge in California on Thursday rejected JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s argument that a since-amended 2011 federal settlement over problematic mortgage servicing practices barred a class action lawsuit alleging the bank fraudulently charged them unnecessary fees.
-
July 27, 2012
Homeowners Say JPMorgan Illegally Marked Up Servicing Fees
A group of homeowners hit JPMorgan Chase & Co. with a putative RICO class action in California federal court Tuesday, alleging the financial giant used automated mortgage loan management systems to cheat borrowers by charging them unnecessary servicing fees.