Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
MATTIACCIO v. DHA GROUP, INC. et al
Case Number:
1:12-cv-01249
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
April 07, 2015
Contractor Can't Ditch FCRA Claims In Background Check Suit
A Washington, D.C., federal judge on Monday nixed a former DHA Group Inc. employee's defamation claims against the government contractor in a row over a post-employment background check, but kept alive his allegations the company violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by improperly conducting the review.
-
March 03, 2014
Atty Found Not Liable For Background Check Run For Client
An attorney who conducted an employee background check on behalf of a federal contracting company cannot be held liable for Fair Credit Reporting Act violations, a D.C. federal court ruled last week, finding that the lawyer was acting as a protected agent of his client.