Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Guillermina Contreras v. Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies Inc
Case Number:
2:12-cv-07099
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 29, 2012
J&J Gets Claims Trimmed From Sunscreen Labeling Suit
A California federal judge on Thursday trimmed a putative class action alleging Johnson & Johnson falsely advertised high-SPF sunscreen products as offering more sun protection than lower-SPF products, finding the plaintiff could not pursue claims involving products she did not purchase.
-
October 18, 2012
J&J Targets Consumer's Standing In Sunscreen False Ad Suit
Johnson & Johnson on Wednesday blasted a proposed class action that alleges some of its high-SPF sunscreens protect the skin no better than lower-SPF products, arguing the suit should be dismissed because the plaintiff had never purchased most of the products.