Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast Insurance Company

  1. October 20, 2016

    Feds Say Insurer Owes Coverage For Naval Shipyard Cleanup

    The U.S. government Wednesday told a California federal court that Steadfast Insurance Co. should have to pay for the environmental remediation costs at a formal naval shipyard, intervening in a developer's breach of contract and bad-faith lawsuit against the insurer.

  2. April 07, 2015

    Hogan Lovells Booted From Naval Shipyard Cleanup Row

    Hogan Lovells can't represent Steadfast Insurance Co. in a dispute over environmental cleanup costs at a former naval shipyard because it also represents the parent company of another party targeted by Steadfast's counterclaims in the case, a California federal judge ruled Tuesday.

  3. February 23, 2015

    CH2M Doubles Down On Hogan DQ Bid In Cleanup Row

    A construction company pushing for Hogan Lovells' disqualification from a lawsuit over environmental remediation costs for a former naval shipyard argued Friday that the firm can't prosecute an insurer's counterclaim against it seeking millions of dollars while advising its parent company on multiple sensitive matters.

  4. February 17, 2015

    Steadfast Fights Hogan Lovells DQ Bid In Cleanup Row

    Steadfast Insurance Co. on Friday fired back at a construction company's bid to disqualify Hogan Lovells from representing it in a dispute over environmental remediation costs for a former naval shipyard, arguing that there is no conflict of interest and that it would be seriously hindered if the firm were disqualified.

  5. January 20, 2015

    Hogan Lovells Faces Disqualification Bid In Cleanup Row

    A construction company previously represented by Hogan Lovells US LLP that is currently disputing environmental remediation costs of a former naval shipyard with Steadfast Insurance Co. and a developer asked a California federal judge to disqualify the firm from representing Steadfast, saying there is a conflict of interest.