Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Bronson et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:12-cv-04184
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 25, 2014
J&J Beats Injunction Bid In Splenda Labeling Suit
A California federal judge Friday ruled that a proposed class of consumers can't win an injunction barring Johnson & Johnson from misrepresenting the health benefits of its Splenda Essentials with Antioxidants because that sweetener is off the market and the plaintiffs have no plans to purchase it.
-
April 17, 2013
J&J Ducks Most Claims In Splenda False Ad Suit
A California federal judge on Tuesday trimmed some claims from a proposed class action against Johnson & Johnson and McNeil Nutritionals LLC alleging they misrepresented the health benefits of some varieties of the sweetener Splenda.