Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Ironshore Indemnity, Inc. v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, P.L.L.C. et al
Case Number:
4:12-cv-02850
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 02, 2015
O'Quinn Suffers Defeat In Silica Malpractice Coverage Suit
Ironshore Indemnity Inc. isn't obligated to defend John M. O'Quinn & Associates LLP against allegations that it mishandled hundreds of occupational silica exposure suits, because the firm knew about those malpractice claims before the insurer issued its policy, a Texas federal judge ruled Monday.
-
June 27, 2014
O'Quinn To Face Ironshore Silica Malpractice Coverage Suit
A Texas federal judge said Wednesday that Ironshore Indemnity Inc. can pursue its effort to avoid covering John M. O'Quinn & Associates LLP in litigation accusing the law firm of mishandling and overcharging on occupational silica exposure suits, finding the firm failed to prove there is no actual controversy.
-
November 16, 2012
O'Quinn Law Firm Wants Ironshore Silica Coverage Suit Axed
The O'Quinn Law Firm asked a Texas federal court to dismiss Ironshore Indemnity Inc.'s lawsuit alleging it has no duty to defend or indemnify the firm in underlying litigation accusing it of overcharging and mishandling occupational silica exposure suits, saying the insurer's suit is premature.
-
September 24, 2012
Ironshore Says O'Quinn Not Covered In Silica Exposure Suit
Ironshore Indemnity Inc. on Friday asked a Texas federal judge to find it has no duty to defend or indemnify The O'Quinn Law Firm in a lawsuit that alleges the firm overcharged and mishandled the claims of workers allegedly exposed to silica at work.