Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Phipps et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Case Number:
3:12-cv-01009
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 22, 2016
Ex-Dukes Members Push To Keep Wal-Mart Class Claims Alive
Three women suing Wal-Mart for gender discrimination fought Friday to keep alive claims on behalf of a proposed regional class, insisting their complaint does not suffer from the same defects found by the U.S. Supreme Court in its landmark Dukes decision.
-
June 13, 2013
Tenn. Judge OKs Quick Appeal On Post-Dukes Class Claims
A Tennessee federal judge on Thursday gave the green light to former members of the nationwide gender discrimination class nixed by the U.S. Supreme Court in its landmark Dukes ruling to appeal her dismissal of their regional class claims against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. as time-barred.
-
March 18, 2013
Wal-Mart Fights Bid For Quick Appeal On Post-Dukes Claims
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. on Thursday opposed an attempt by three women to revive classwide gender bias claims against the retail giant in Tennessee federal court, saying the women wrongly claimed two U.S. Supreme Court rulings implicitly overruled a decision that led to the dismissal of their class claims.
-
March 04, 2013
Ex-Dukes Members Fight To Revive Wal-Mart Class Claims
A trio of women who were part of the nationwide gender discrimination class nixed by the U.S. Supreme Court in its landmark 2011 Dukes ruling asked a Tennessee federal judge Thursday for the green light to appeal a recent decision that dismissed their regional class claims against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. as time-barred.
-
February 20, 2013
Wal-Mart Beats Ex-Dukes Members' Bias Class Claims
A Tennessee federal judge on Wednesday nixed as time-barred regional class claims lodged in October by a trio of women whose workplace discrimination allegations were previously raised in Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
-
October 26, 2012
Wal-Mart Says New Sex Bias Claims Came Too Late
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. on Thursday fought back against a class action brought by a trio of women whose workplace discrimination claims were previously raised in Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., arguing the plaintiffs couldn't revive "stale" class claims following the decertification in Dukes.
-
October 03, 2012
Employers Brace For More Mini-Class Actions After Dukes
With female Wal-Mart Stores Inc. employees launching a third high-profile regional discrimination suit Tuesday on the heels of the U.S. Supreme Court's decertification of a massive nationwide class, attorneys say national employers should be prepared for an increase in similar coordinated regional class actions.
-
October 02, 2012
Female Wal-Mart Employees File Bias Class Action In Tenn.
In another regional discrimination suit to be filed against Wal-Mart Stores Inc., three Tennessee women alleged on Tuesday that female employees of the giant retailer in five states have been unfairly denied equal pay and equal opportunities for promotion to management positions.