Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Stewart v. Gogo, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

3:12-cv-05164

See also:

4:12-cv-05164

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Maxine M. Chesney

Firms

Krause Kalfayan

January 30, 2014
Gogo Can't Get In-Flight Internet Monopoly Suit Grounded

A California federal judge on Thursday rejected in-flight Internet provider Gogo Inc.'s attempts to dodge a putative class action alleging Gogo's unfair, long-term contracts with airlines created a monopoly, ruling the plaintiffs had backed up their allegations with specific facts.
April 10, 2013
Gogo Beats Suit Claiming In-Flight Internet Monopoly

A California federal judge Wednesday threw out a putative class action accusing in-flight Internet provider Gogo Inc. of achieving a monopoly on the industry through unfair airline contracts, ruling the plaintiffs failed to adequately claim that such contracts foreclosed competition in a substantial part of the market.
December 11, 2012
Gogo Denies Class Claims Of In-Flight Internet Monopoly

Gogo Inc. on Monday asked a California federal court to throw out a proposed class action accusing the in-flight Internet provider of achieving a monopoly on the industry through unfair airline contracts, arguing that contrary to the class claims, the market for such services remains "dynamic and competitive."