Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Corra v. Energizer Holdings Inc., et al
Case Number:
1:12-cv-01736
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 02, 2013
Playtex Can't Escape Suit Over Banana Boat Sunscreen Ads
A California federal judge on Thursday preserved most of a proposed class action accusing Playtex Products Inc. of misleadingly marketing the SPF 85-110 formulas of its Banana Boat sunscreen as having superior sunburn protection, ruling the plaintiff could sue over products she didn't buy.
-
October 29, 2012
Banana Boat Sunscreen Ads Are Misleading, Class Says
Banana Boat sunblock says its SPF 85-110 formulas provide superior sunburn protection, but a California woman on Thursday said in a proposed class action against suncreen maker Playtex Products Inc. that the claim is misleading.