Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Otto Naumann, LTD.
Case Number:
1:12-cv-08224
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
March 03, 2017
Gallery Says Insurer Can't Recover Payout After Picture Found
A Manhattan art gallery has urged a federal court to deny XL Specialty Insurance Co's bid for reimbursement of a claim paid for a Dutch master painting presumed stolen that turned out to be merely misplaced, saying, in effect, that established law clearly supports Shakespeare's maxim, "But men are men; the best sometimes forget."
-
January 19, 2017
Insurer Says Painting It Paid For Was Misplaced, Not Stolen
XL Specialty Insurance Co. asked a New York federal judge Thursday to order a Manhattan art gallery to reimburse the insurer for covering a painting the owner reported stolen when it turns out he merely forgot he had sent it to be reframed.