Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
MDL 2048 Cox Enterprises Inc Set-Top Cable Television Box Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
5:12-ml-02048
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Burch & Cracchiolo
- Crowe & Dunlevy
- Fishman Haygood
- Gonzalez Saggio
- Gordon Arata
- Kanner & Whiteley
- Landskroner Grieco
- Latham & Watkins
- Mintz Levin
- Schneider Wallace
- Wright Law LLC
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 17, 2015
Cox Antitrust Bellwether Plaintiffs Appeal Vacated $6M Verdict
A class of plaintiffs in a bellwether case in an antitrust multidistrict litigation against Cox Communications appealed to the Tenth Circuit Tuesday an order overturning the $6.31 million previously awarded to them, after a judge found they presented no evidence showing that competitors were blocked from the market.
-
November 12, 2015
Cox $6M Verdict Defeat Echoes Across Cable Antitrust MDLs
An Oklahoma federal judge's decision Thursday to overturn a $6.31 million jury verdict in an antitrust bellwether against Cox Communications cues up a high-stakes appeal that could influence class actions nationwide accusing Cox and other cable providers of illegally tying set-top box rentals to premium cable services.
-
November 12, 2015
Cox Gets $6M Verdict Overturned In Cable Box Bellwether
A federal judge on Thursday overturned a $6.31 million verdict against Cox Communications in a closely watched antitrust trial, saying a jury was wrong to find that Cox had pushed out competitors in the Oklahoma City market where it was accused of forcing cable subscribers to rent its own set-top box.
-
October 30, 2015
Cox Subscribers' Bellwether Win Will Serve As MDL Blueprint
Cable subscribers who won a jury trial Thursday against Cox Communications over premium cable services tied to set-top boxes fell far short of the damages they sought, but the $6.31 million verdict will nonetheless serve as a blueprint for plaintiffs in upcoming trials throughout Cox's 17 other markets.
-
October 29, 2015
Jury Awards Cox Subscribers $6M In Cable Box Antitrust Suit
An Oklahoma federal jury on Thursday concluded that Cox Communications Inc. had violated antitrust law by tying premium cable services to set-top box rentals, awarding subscribers $6.31 million in damages that can be trebled, according to the plaintiffs' attorney.
-
October 28, 2015
Jury Deliberations Drag On In Cox Antitrust Bellwether
Jurors considering claims that Cox Communications Inc. overcharged premium-cable subscribers by forcing them to rent Cox's own set-top box failed to reach a verdict Wednesday, but broke their two-day silence with a first note to the judge.
-
October 26, 2015
Cox Cable-Box Antitrust Bellwether Goes To Jury
Jury deliberations began Monday in a bellwether antitrust trial over Cox Communication Inc.'s alleged practice of tying premium cable services to its set-top box rentals, after attorneys for cable subscribers closed their case by saying Cox has waged a campaign of deception to boost profits.
-
October 23, 2015
Cox Cable Subscribers Slam Bid To Cut Antitrust Trial Short
The cable subscribers accusing Cox Communications of illegally tying premium cable service to the rental of set-top boxes urged an Oklahoma federal court Friday to reject the cable giant's motion for judgment in the bellwether antitrust trial, saying Cox simply rehashed previously rejected arguments.
-
October 22, 2015
Cox Seeks Win On Day 6 Of Bellwether Antitrust Trial
Cox Communications Inc. urged an Oklahoma federal judge Wednesday to cut short a bellwether antitrust trial accusing the cable provider of illegally tying premium cable service to rental of its set-top boxes, saying customers hadn't proven their case as the trial entered its sixth day.
-
October 13, 2015
Cox Customer Balks At Jury Instruction In Antitrust Bellwether
A customer accusing Cox Communications of tying premium cable services to its set-top box rentals in a bellwether antitrust class action blasted the company's proposed jury instruction supplement on damages in Oklahoma federal court Friday, arguing it runs counter to economic reality.