Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Suture Express, Inc. v. Cardinal Health, Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:12-cv-02760
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker Sterchi
- Berkowitz Oliver
- Crowell & Moring
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Jones Day
- Polsinelli PC
- Sharp Law LLP
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 08, 2016
$200M Suture Antitrust Suit Nixed For Lack Of Market Power
A Kansas federal judge had dismissed Suture Express' $200 million antitrust suit against Cardinal Health and Owens & Minor because the wound care company failed to prove the other two had market power and that competition was injured by the alleged predatory pricing scheme, according to an order unsealed Thursday.
-
April 04, 2016
Suture To Take $200M Antitrust Suit Dismissal To 10th Circ.
Wound care supplier Suture Express Inc. on Friday said it will be appealing to the Tenth Circuit a federal judge's decision to dismiss its $200 million case accusing Cardinal Health Inc. and Owens & Minor Inc. of a predatory pricing scheme to prevent hospitals from buying from Suture.
-
November 17, 2015
Suture Express Wants Liability Ruling In $200M Antitrust Suit
Wound care supplier Suture Express has urged a Kansas federal court to rule that Cardinal Health and Owens & Minor are liable for predatory pricing and tying in their sale of wound closure products in a $200 million antitrust suit, saying it has shown they penalized hospitals that sought the products from Suture Express.
-
August 05, 2013
$200M Cardinal, Owens & Minor Antitrust Suit Trimmed
A Kansas federal judge on Monday trimmed a $200 million antitrust suit accusing units of Cardinal Health Inc. and Owens & Minor Inc. of predatory pricing and tying in their sale of wound closure products, ruling plaintiff Suture Express Inc. had failed to properly back some of its claims.
-
December 06, 2012
Cardinal, Owens & Minor Hit With $200M Antitrust Suit
A specialty distributor of wound-closure products hit Cardinal Health Inc. and Owens & Minor Inc. with a $200 million antitrust lawsuit Wednesday, accusing the firms of engaging in predatory pricing and illegally penalizing customers who didn't buy their sutures, stitches and similar merchandise.