Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Safeway, Inc.,
Case Number:
2:12-cv-00800
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Findlay Craft
- Fitch Even
- Gillam Smith
- Hansley Law Firm PLLC
- Law Office of Scott Woloson
- Reed Smith
- Yarbrough Wilcox
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 13, 2015
Safeway Only Gets Partial Costs After Rewards Patent Win
A Federal Circuit judge presiding over a Texas patent case against Safeway Inc. denied a large part of the grocer's request for more than $90,000 in costs even after having invalidated the patent for claiming an abstract idea, saying Thursday that Safeway didn't show the costs were all necessary.
-
June 01, 2015
Safeway Gets Rewards Patent Nixed As Abstract Under Alice
A Federal Circuit judge presiding over a case in the Eastern District of Texas ruled Friday that a customer rewards patent asserted against supermarket chain Safeway Inc. and other retailers is invalid because it claims only an abstract idea, and is also obvious and anticipated.