Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

The University of Pittsburgh v. Lexington Insurance Company et al

  1. December 09, 2016

    Axis Gets Win In University Construction Coverage Suit

    A New York federal judge ruled Thursday that Axis Insurance Co. need not cover an architecture firm for problems and delays that plagued a $40 million University of Pittsburgh construction project, ending a saga in which Axis had been the last potential coverage provider standing.

  2. October 17, 2016

    Axis Seeks No-Coverage Ruling In Pitt Construction Suit

    Axis Insurance Co. has asked a New York federal court to rule that it doesn't have to provide coverage for a $40 million University of Pittsburgh construction project gone wrong, saying the insurer for the previous policy period would have been the one responsible — even though a judge has already ruled that it's not.

  3. September 16, 2016

    Lexington Insurance Escapes Pitt Construction Coverage Row

    A New York federal judge on Friday held that Lexington Insurance Co. doesn't have to cover claims tied to delays on a $40 million construction project on the University of Pittsburgh campus, concluding that its policyholder, the architect in charge, didn't provide sufficient notice before their contract ended.

  4. August 26, 2016

    Lexington Pushes For Win In Pitt Construction Coverage Row

    Lexington Insurance Co. on Friday asked a New York federal judge to rule that it doesn't have to cover claims tied to delays on a $40 million project on the University of Pittsburgh campus, asserting that its policyholder, the architect in charge, failed to provide timely notice of a potential claim.

  5. July 21, 2016

    Pitt Project Architect's Insurance Notice Deficient, Judge Says

    A New York federal judge on Thursday declined to grant the University of Pittsburgh quick judgment in its dispute with Lexington Insurance over coverage of a delayed $40 million campus project, finding that Lexington's policyholder, the architect in charge, failed to properly notify its insurer of a potential claim.

  6. July 14, 2016

    Insurer Muddying Building-Delay Fight, Pitt Says

    The University of Pittsburgh pressed for partial summary judgment Thursday in a suit over insurance coverage for disorganization and delays on a $40 million addition to a historic campus building, calling Lexington Insurance Co.'s arguments over timely notice "a red herring."

  7. July 11, 2016

    Lexington Argues U. Pitt Not Covered In Construction Suit

    Lexington Insurance Co. should not cover the University of Pittsburgh in a suit over damages caused by construction delays at a historic campus landmark because the architect in charge of the project didn't tell the insurer it could be sued during the policy term and then made its claim after the coverage agreement had long expired, a New York federal judge was told Friday.

  8. June 15, 2016

    U. Of Pittsburgh Says Delayed Campus Project Is Covered

    The University of Pittsburgh urged a New York federal court Wednesday to find Lexington Insurance Co. was properly notified of a claim for damages caused by construction delays at a historic campus landmark, saying the insurer wrongfully cited inadequate notice to deny coverage.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!