VALIDUS REINSURANCE, LTD. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

1:13-cv-00109

Court:

District Of Columbia

Nature of Suit:

Taxes

Judge:

Amy Berman Jackson

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. February 18, 2014

    Validus Case Opens Door For Retrocession Tax Refunds

    The reinsurance industry recently racked up a big win over the Internal Revenue Service in a case surrounding the taxation of certain retrocession insurance policies, but the complexity of the case is keeping even some industry insiders in the dark on their new ability to file for a refund.

  2. February 05, 2014

    IRS Can't Double-Tax Retrocessions, Judge Says

    The D.C. District Court on Wednesday found that federal law bars the Internal Revenue Service from collecting excise taxes on certain retrocession insurance policies, ordering the IRS to refund $425,000 in double-imposed taxes to a foreign reinsurance company.

  3. November 25, 2013

    Retrocessions Subject To Double Taxation, IRS Tells Judge

    An excise tax on foreign-to-foreign reinsurance premiums is a perfectly legal form of double taxation, the IRS told a District of Columbia federal court on Friday.

  4. October 31, 2013

    Insurer Seeks End to Foreign Reinsurance Excise Taxes

    The Internal Revenue Service's enforcement of a 1 percent excise tax on certain foreign-to-foreign reinsurance premiums violates congressional intent, Bermuda-based insurance company Validus Reinsurance Ltd. told the District of Columbia federal court Thursday.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!