Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Municipality of Anchorage v. Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation et al
Case Number:
3:13-cv-00063
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Birch Horton
- Burr Pease
- Cairncross & Hempelmann
- Carney Badley
- Cashion Gilmore
- Corr Cronin
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Holland & Hart
- McDowell Rice
- Oles Morrison
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Skellenger Bender
- Watt Tieder
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 23, 2015
Fault Allocation Limited In $340M Alaska Harbor Project Suit
An Alaska federal judge on Monday ruled that a state apportionment of damages law applies only to tort claims and allowed certain subcontractor defendants to be added as third-party defendants in a suit by the municipality of Anchorage accusing engineering contractors of botching $340 million worth of work in the city's port project.
-
March 05, 2015
No Quick Win For Contractor In $340M Harbor Project Suit
An Alaska federal judge ruled Wednesday that engineering contractors can't escape a suit accusing them of botching $340 million worth of work on an Alaskan port project by citing the state's economic loss doctrine, which generally bars tort recovery for purely economic losses.