Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Adaptix, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership et al
Case Number:
5:13-cv-01844
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Akin Gump
- Bunsow De Mory
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Hayes Messina
- Mintz Levin
- Orrick Herrington
- Perkins Coie
- Potter Minton
- Prince Lobel
- Williams Simons
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 07, 2015
Apple, AT&T, VZW Seek 'Exceptional' Fees In Adaptix IP Row
Apple Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and Verizon Wireless urged a California federal judge Tuesday to award them attorneys' fees in Adaptix Inc.'s cases accusing them of infringing two data-encoding patents, arguing Adaptix's numerous baseless lawsuits make the cases exceptional under the U.S. Supreme Court's Octane ruling.
-
January 26, 2015
Adaptix Patents In Apple, AT&T, Verizon Suits Ruled Invalid
A California federal magistrate judge on Friday ruled that claims of two Adaptix Inc. data encoding patents are invalid due to indefiniteness, a week after ruling that Apple Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless and HTC Corp. did not directly infringe the patents.
-
November 04, 2014
Adaptix Says No Evidence Its Patents Used AT&T Secrets
Adaptix Inc. urged a California federal judge to rule that two data-encoding patents it accuses Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC of infringing are valid, arguing Tuesday that the defendants lack convincing evidence that a handful of AT&T engineers defected to Adaptix and essentially handed it the inventions.