Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

LARRY PITT & ASSOCIATES v. LUNDY LAW, LLP et al

  1. February 16, 2018

    Lundy Law Scolded In Decision Axing False Advertising Suit

    A federal judge upbraided Philadelphia-based personal injury firm Lundy Law LLP on Thursday for advertisements that seemingly overstated the scope of its services, but ultimately agreed that a rival did not have grounds to move forward with a lawsuit seeking damages over the purported misrepresentations.

  2. March 01, 2017

    Philly Firm Denied Sanctions, New Shot At Ad Monopoly Suit

    A Pennsylvania federal judge on Tuesday denied a bid for sanctions by Larry Pitt & Associates in a lawsuit related to allegations that Lundy Law LLP stifled competition in Philadelphia, and she found that the firm waited too long to request leave from the court to file its latest complaint in the case.

  3. November 04, 2015

    BakerHostetler Can't Ditch Law Firm Client, Court Hears

    BakerHostetler can't stop representing Larry Pitt & Associates in litigation accusing Lundy Law LLP of stifling competition, the Pitt firm told a Pennsylvania federal judge Tuesday, saying the "untimely and inappropriate" attempt to withdraw for an alleged lack of payment has no factual support.

  4. October 09, 2015

    BakerHostetler Says Pa. Law Firm Owes It Fees In Ad Row

    BakerHostetler on Thursday urged a Pennsylvania federal judge to allow it to stop representing Larry Pitt & Associates in that firm's suit accusing Lundy Law LLP of stifling competition, arguing the Pitt firm owes fees to BakerHostetler.

  5. October 01, 2014

    Judge Again Slashes Antitrust Claims In Philly Firms' Ad Row

    A Pennsylvania federal judge on Tuesday again trimmed Larry Pitt & Associates' antitrust claims accusing Lundy Law LLP of stifling competition, ruling that Pitt had not proven that Lundy's exclusive agreements for ads on Philadelphia-area public transit amount to Sherman Act violations.

  6. December 16, 2013

    Philly Law Firm Gets Antitrust Claims Cut From Bus Ad Suit

    A Pennsylvania federal judge on Friday trimmed claims from a suit that a Philadelphia-area law firm filed against a competitor over its exclusive agreements to advertise on certain transit agencies' buses, dismissing allegations that Lundy Law LLP's ad contracts were anti-competitive but preserving a false advertising claim against the firm.

  7. October 21, 2013

    Rival Blasts Dismissal Bid In Law Firm Ad Monopoly Row

    A Philadelphia-based personal injury firm that alleges a rival firm violated antitrust laws by negotiating exclusive deals to advertise on buses blasted a bid to dismiss the suit on Friday, arguing that it had pled sufficient facts to show injury to its business and the market.

  8. May 02, 2013

    Lundy Law Firm 'Monopolized' Philly Legal Ads, Rival Says

    Pennsylvania-based personal injury law firm Lundy Law LLP and its managing partner were hit with a lawsuit Thursday by rival firm Larry Pitt & Associates claiming the defendants sought to dominate legal advertisements by striking exclusive advertising deals with companies and bringing a "baseless" trademark infringement suit against it.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!