Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Case Number:
7:13-cv-03073
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 02, 2017
J&J Wins OK For $7M Aveeno Natural Labeling Settlement
A New York federal judge on Wednesday signed off on a $6.75 million settlement between Johnson & Johnson and a class of Aveeno personal care products customers who say they were misled about how natural the products were, and then cleared $2.25 million to be set aside for attorneys' fees.
-
October 16, 2017
Counsel In J&J 'Natural' Labeling Suit Seek $2.25M Fees
Counsel for a class of consumers that reached a $6.75 million agreement with Johnson & Johnson to end claims over allegedly misleading labeling on Aveeno personal care products on Friday urged a New York federal court to allocate $2.25 million of the settlement fund to attorneys' fees and expenses.
-
May 26, 2017
J&J's Aveeno Settles 'Natural' Labeling Suit For $6.75M
Johnson & Johnson will pay $6.75 million and remove an "Active Naturals" label from a line of Aveeno products after consumers complained the name was deceptive since the products contained synthetic ingredients, according to a settlement agreement filed in New York federal court on Friday.
-
October 04, 2016
Aveeno Buyers Get Class Cert. In 'Natural' Labeling Suit
A New York federal judge on Tuesday certified three classes of consumers from New York, California and Florida who allege the "Active Naturals" labeling on Johnson & Johnson's Aveeno line of products is deceptive since the products contain synthetic ingredients, saying class requirements have been met.
-
December 21, 2015
Group Says Aveeno 'Natural' Label Common In False Ad Suit
A proposed class of consumers accusing Johnson & Johnson of advertising its Aveeno line of personal care products as "natural" when they actually contain synthetic chemicals told a New York federal judge Friday that the company's label is uniform and misleading to a reasonable consumer, circumstances ripe for certification.
-
December 18, 2015
Consumers In Aveeno 'Natural' False Ad Suit Seek Cert.
A proposed class of consumers accusing Johnson & Johnson of advertising its Aveeno line of personal care products as "natural" when they actually contain synthetic chemicals pushed a New York federal judge for certification, saying the deception affected millions.
-
March 28, 2014
J&J Can't Avoid Class Action Over Aveeno 'Natural' Claims
A New York federal judge on Thursday largely upheld a proposed class action accusing Johnson & Johnson of advertising its Aveeno line of personal care products as "natural" even though the products contain synthetic chemicals, ruling plaintiffs can move forward with allegations that the labels are misleading.
-
May 08, 2013
J&J Hit With Class Action Over Aveeno 'Natural' Claims
Johnson & Johnson was hit Tuesday with a proposed class action in New York federal court accusing the company of misleading consumers by advertising its Aveeno line of personal care products as "natural" when they include several synthetic chemicals.