Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Procter & Gamble Company v. CAO Group, Inc.
Case Number:
1:13-cv-00337
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 01, 2014
PTAB Refuses To Review P&G's Crest Whitestrips Patents
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has refused to institute inter partes review of three patents covering Procter & Gamble Co.'s teeth-whitening product Crest Whitestrips, ruling that accused infringer CAO Group Inc. failed to show the patents are likely invalid.
-
May 21, 2014
P&G's Crest Whitestrips Patents Not Invalid, Judge Rules
An Ohio federal judge on Wednesday ruled that two of Procter & Gamble Co.'s patents for teeth-whitening product Crest Whitestrips are not invalid as indefinite, rejecting alleged infringer CAO Group Inc.'s arguments that the patents' claims are incapable of interpretation.
-
May 20, 2013
Dental-Care Company Infringes Crest Patents, P&G Says
The Procter & Gamble Co. filed a suit Monday in Ohio federal court alleging that CAO Group Inc. had violated three of the personal-hygiene and cleaning-product giant's patents for its teeth-whitening product Crest Whitestrips.