Russell Minoru Ono v. Head Racquet Sports USA

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

2:13-cv-04222

Court:

California Central

Nature of Suit:

Other Fraud

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Fernando M. Olguin

Firms

  1. July 01, 2016

    Tennis Fan Hits Back At Head Racquet Bid To Squash Ad Row

    A tennis enthusiast told a California federal judge Friday that Head Racquet Sports USA cannot escape a suit claiming the company falsely advertised its rackets as the product of choice for professional athletes, saying he is entitled to pursue an order barring the equipment maker from misleading consumers.

  2. May 16, 2016

    Head Racquet Seeks End To Ad Suit After Class Cert. Denial

    Head Racquet Sports USA on Friday urged a California federal judge to throw out a case filed by a group of tennis enthusiasts who claim the company falsely advertised their rackets as the product of choice for pro athletes like Andy Murray, saying the case is little more than a single consumer's complaint because the court has denied class certification.

  3. March 09, 2016

    Tennis Racket Buyers Denied Cert. In False Ad Row

    A California federal judge on Tuesday declined to certify a class of tennis enthusiasts who claim that Head Racquet Sports USA falsely advertised its tennis rackets as the rackets of choice for professionals like Andy Murray, saying the company's marketing was relatively limited to a niche audience.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!