Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Adrea, LLC v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:13-cv-04137
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 03, 2017
Adrea Seeks More Damages From B&N In E-Reader Patent Suit
Adrea LLC asked a New York federal court Thursday for additional damages from Barnes & Noble for patent violation, saying the $266,832 awarded doesn't account for some sales of the bookseller's infringing Nook e-reader.
-
January 04, 2017
Barnes & Noble Ordered To Pay $266K In E-Book Patent Row
A New York federal judge on Tuesday ordered Barnes & Noble Inc. to pay $266,832 in damages for infringing an Adrea LLC patent with its Nook e-reader, after determining an acceptable royalty rate based on the number of e-readers sold and other factors.
-
August 29, 2016
Barnes & Noble Wants E-Book IP Damages Limited To $100K
Barnes & Noble on Friday asked U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff to limit e-book infringement damages to just over $100,000, saying that Adrea LLC's economic analysis was faulty and that a two-cent royalty rate was proper.
-
February 24, 2016
B&N Loses Bid To Reverse E-Book Infringement Verdict
A New York federal judge on Wednesday refused to overturn part of a jury's finding that Barnes & Noble infringed two e-book technology patents by Adrea but ordered a limited new trial to determine damages after a post-trial ruling invalidated part of one of the patents under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice decision.
-
July 24, 2015
Rakoff Grants B&N's Bid To Trim E-Book Patent Under Alice
U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff ruled Thursday that part of an e-book patent owned by Adrea LLC is invalid under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling for claiming only abstract ideas, potentially impacting a $1.3 million infringement verdict against Barnes & Noble Inc.
-
November 04, 2014
Jury Orders B&N To Pay $1.3M In Nook Patent Row
A New York federal jury has awarded Adrea LLC $1.3 million for Barnes & Nobles Inc.'s infringement of two e-book technology patents, finding the booksellers' Nook e-readers infringed patents covering digital rentals and a system for retrieving information about the devices.