Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Case Number:
1:09-cv-06610
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Boersch Shapiro
- Boodell & Domanskis
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Cotsirilos Tighe
- Covington & Burling
- Crowell & Moring
- Davis Polk
- Eimer Stahl
- Farmer Brownstein
- Freitas & Weinberg
- Gibson Dunn
- Goldberg Kohn
- Jones Day
- Law Office of John D. Cline
- Loevy & Loevy
- Murphy & Dunn
- Neal Gerber
- Nossaman LLP
- Paul Weiss
- Porter Wright
- Rothschild Barry
- Saul Ewing
- Searby LLP
- Sheppard Mullin
- Shook Hardy
- Simpson Thacher
- Ulmer & Berne
- White & Case
Companies
- AU Optronics Corp.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- LG Display Co. Ltd.
- Panasonic Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Sharp Corp.
- Toshiba Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 13, 2015
Motorola Drops LCD Price-Fixing Claims Against AU Optronics
An Illinois federal judge on Thursday signed off on a joint petition to dismiss with prejudice Motorola Mobility LLC's claims against AU Optronics Corp. as part of its $3.5 billion price-fixing case against several liquid crystal display panel makers.
-
January 23, 2014
Motorola's Foreign Injury Claims Against LCD Makers Tossed
An Illinois federal judge on Thursday dismissed most of the antitrust claims brought by Motorola Mobility Inc. against a slew of liquid crystal display makers, including Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Sharp Corp., ruling that U.S. antitrust law doesn't apply to purchases involving foreign subsidiaries.
-
October 31, 2013
Japan Attacks Ruling In LCD Price-Fixing MDL
The government of Japan asked an Illinois federal judge on Thursday to reconsider a 2012 summary judgment ruling allowing Motorola Mobility Inc. to to pursue U.S. antitrust claims against a slew of liquid crystal display makers based on purchases of LCD panels by its foreign subsidiaries, saying it violated Japanese sovereignty.