Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Sandoval et al v. Ali et al
Case Number:
3:13-cv-03230
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
June 15, 2016
Auto Body Co. Says OT Claims Too Unique For Class Cert.
A group of affiliated auto body shops on Tuesday urged a California federal court to decertify a conditional class of workers claiming they were denied overtime pay in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, arguing it's nearly impossible to discern the class from other uncertified workers in the action.
-
June 17, 2015
Plaintiffs' Firm Defends Against DQ In Auto Shop Wage Suit
Mallison & Martinez told a California federal court Tuesday that a group of auto body shops, seeking to disqualify the firm from representing employee plaintiffs in a putative rest break class action, are attempting to create alleged conflicts of interest by "stretching the truth beyond the breaking point."
-
June 03, 2015
Auto Shops Want Workers' Counsel DQ'd Over Similar Suits
A group of auto shops facing employees' proposed class actions over alleged rest-break violations urged a California federal court Tuesday to disqualify plaintiffs' firm Mallison & Martinez, arguing that the firm's representation of a similar class action with alternate legal theories creates a "blatant conflict of interest."