Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Singh v. Orthofix International N.V. et al
Case Number:
1:13-cv-05696
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Bernstein Litowitz
- Cohen Milstein
- Cooley LLP
- Hagens Berman
- Hogan Lovells
- Holzer & Holzer
- King & Spalding
- Lankler Siffert
- Paul Hastings
- Robbins Geller
- Shapiro Arato
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 08, 2015
Orthofix Reaches $11M Settlement in Securities Action
Medical device company Orthofix International NV has agreed to pay $11 million to settle a New York federal court investor class action alleging that the company glossed over internal issues before an eventual earnings restatement, according to a filing in New York federal court.
-
August 19, 2013
Orthofix Flooded With Investor Suits Over Restated Earnings
Medical device company Orthofix International NV was hit with a wave of proposed securities class actions last week, alleging the firm had painted an improperly rosy picture of its business to investors before disclosing that it would have to restate more than two years worth of financial results.