Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Hansell et al v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:13-cv-03440
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Abington Cole
- Carlton Fields
- Hattis Law
- Law Offices of Paul M. Monzione
- Lieff Cabraser
- Morgan & Morgan
- Sidley Austin
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 11, 2015
Judge Won't Rethink $40M TracFone False Ad Settlement
A California federal judge refused Monday to reconsider his approval of a $40 million settlement that TracFone Wireless Inc. reached in a class action over the company's alleged false advertising of prepaid phone services, saying the objector merely repeated arguments that had already been rejected.
-
July 06, 2015
TracFone's $40M Settlement Over False Advertising Approved
TracFone Wireless Inc. won a California federal judge's stamp of approval Thursday on a $40 million settlement with a proposed class that had alleged false advertising in the company's unlimited plan because it "throttled" data usage after a certain amount.
-
June 17, 2015
TracFone Says Objections Can't Stop $40M False Ad Deal
TracFone Wireless Inc. told a California federal judge on Tuesday to approve a $40 million settlement in a class action alleging it falsely advertised unlimited smartphone data plans, concurring with class members that objections to the settlement were meritless.
-
June 10, 2015
TracFone Users Want $40M False Ad Deal Approved
TracFone Wireless Inc. consumers who support a $40 million settlement in a class action over the company's alleged false advertising of prepaid phone services urged a California federal judge on Tuesday to overrule objections to the deal, saying that most class members approve.
-
March 12, 2014
Class Actions Clash Over Wal-Mart Prepaid Phone Settlement
Plaintiffs in three putative class actions in California claiming Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and TracFone Wireless Inc. falsely advertised prepaid phone services moved to intervene in a similar suit in Florida federal court on Wednesday, criticizing a proposed settlement in that suit and seeking a stay or dismissal.