March 18, 2020
On remand from the Federal Circuit, a Delaware federal judge Wednesday left intact SRI International's $8 million attorney fee award, but rejected its bid to reinstate enhanced damages and the jury's finding that Cisco willfully infringed two of SRI's network surveillance patents.
May 25, 2017
A Delaware federal judge on Thursday shut down Cisco's efforts to nix a $24 million verdict won by SRI International in the companies' dispute over network surveillance patents, and instead doubled the damages award and awarded SRI $8 million in attorneys' fees on top.
September 06, 2016
SRI International Inc. has blasted Cisco Systems Inc.'s attempt to nix a $24 million verdict in their patent dispute over network surveillance technology, telling a Delaware federal judge that Cisco is engaging in "revisionist history."
August 26, 2016
Cisco is urging a Delaware federal judge to throw out a $24 million jury verdict awarded to SRI International in a patent infringement trial over network surveillance technology, saying the verdict was not supported by the evidence and the award was excessive.
August 12, 2016
Cisco has asked a Delaware federal judge not to grant $9 million in attorneys' fees on top of the $24 million a jury awarded SRI International in a patent infringement trial, arguing enhanced damages weren't appropriate because Cisco's conduct wasn't egregious and its accused technology is being phased out.
May 31, 2016
Weeks after a jury told Cisco Systems Inc. to pay $24 million for infringing two SRI International Inc. network surveillance patents, SRI asked a judge Friday to order Cisco to pay $9 million in attorneys' fees, calling the company's defense at trial "exceptionally weak."
May 12, 2016
Cisco Systems Inc. infringed two network surveillance patents owned by SRI International Inc., a Delaware federal jury decided Thursday, ordering the California tech company to pay nearly $24 million in damages.
April 13, 2016
A Delaware federal judge has rejected Cisco's argument that two network surveillance patents that SRI accuses it of infringing are invalid under Alice, an analysis she called a "difficult exercise," clearing the way for a trial to begin next month.