Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Scott Johnson, etc. v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
Case Number:
13-2681
Court:
Nature of Suit:
-
June 06, 2014
CORRECTED: 8th Circ. Affirms Expert Testimony In Enfamil Illness Suit
The Eighth Circuit has ruled that a Minnesota federal judge abused her discretion when she excluded expert testimony in a lawsuit seeking to link Mead Johnson & Co. LLC’s infant formula and a child’s disabling illness, and revived the child’s guardian’s suit against the company. [Correction: An earlier story misstated that the appeals court's ruling applied to expert testimony regarding a genetic test known as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, or PFGE, analysis. The error has been corrected.]
-
February 12, 2014
Enfamil Maker Fights Bid To Reinstate Infant Death Suit
Mead Johnson & Company LLC urged the Eighth Circuit on Tuesday to uphold the dismissal of an infant formula contamination suit, because the plaintiff had used a flawed methodology to claim the contamination was caused by the formula rather than the water supply or other sources.