Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Indiezone, Inc. et al v. Rooke et al
Case Number:
3:13-cv-04280
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Judge:
Firms
- Faegre Drinker
- Farella Braun
- Law Offices of Douglas R. Dollinger
- Maslon LLP
- Orrick Herrington
- Reed Smith
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 17, 2014
Startup Says Plaintiff In Junked IP Suit Not A Sham Co.
E-commerce startup Indiezone Inc. on Tuesday urged a California federal judge to revive its copyright infringement and trade secrets suit against a pair of former officers, arguing their theft prevented Indiezone's CEO from realizing he was using a defunct company as a plaintiff.
-
September 02, 2014
Sham Plaintiff Dooms Startup's IP, Trade Secrets Suit
A California federal judge on Tuesday tossed e-commerce startup Indiezone Inc.'s copyright infringement and trade secrets suit against a pair of former officers, slamming the company for conjuring up a sham company to use as a plaintiff in an attempt to skirt an arbitration agreement.