POMWonderful LLC v. Pur Beverages LLC et al

  1. June 29, 2016

    Pom Wins TM Victory Over Competitor's 'Pom' Flavor Name

    A California federal judge handed a trademark win to Pom Wonderful LLC on Wednesday, saying Oregon-based beverage maker Pur Beverages Inc. couldn't prove the word "pom" was generic, while also ruling Pom Wonderful's use of a heart-shaped "o" did not deviate far enough from its "POM" trademark to constitute abandonment of the mark.

  2. May 19, 2016

    Pom Says 'Virtually Identical' Mark Makes For Easy TM Win

    Pom Wonderful LLC urged a California federal judge Wednesday to rule that Pur Beverages Inc. infringed its trademark by using a "virtually identical" mark with the word "pom" to describe a pomegranate flavor, saying summary judgment should be an easy call given the likelihood of customer confusion.

  3. August 03, 2015

    Pom Loses Injunction Bid Again In Trademark Spat With Pur

    A California federal judge, who the Ninth Circuit said had erred by denying an injunction bid by Pom Wonderful LLC, again rebuffed Pom's bid on Monday to block sales of Pur Beverages' allegedly trademark-infringing energy drinks, tentatively ruling Pom still hadn't shown Pur's sales are harming its brand.

  4. January 21, 2014

    Pur Shakes Injunction Bid In Pom Wonderful Trademark Spat

    A California federal judge on Friday declined a bid from Pom Wonderful LLC to block the sale of energy drinks sold by Pur Beverages that it says violate a trademark for its own line of juices, ruling that the competing marks are distinct enough that consumer confusion is unlikely.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!