Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Dan Oliver, et al v. SD-3C LLC, et al
Case Number:
12-16421
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 14, 2014
Panasonic, Toshiba Will Face SD Card Antitrust Class Anew
The Ninth Circuit revived a putative consumer class action alleging Panasonic Corp., Toshiba Corp. and SanDisk Corp. tried to limit competition in the secure disk memory cards market via patent-licensing restrictions, ruling Wednesday that a district judge had improperly found that the plaintiffs' claims were time-barred.
-
December 05, 2013
Memory Card Patent Cartel Claims Timely, 9th Circ. Told
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and a class of consumers urged the Ninth Circuit on Thursday to revive their separate antitrust suits over an alleged patent-licensing cartel among Panasonic Corp. and other flash memory card makers, arguing that a district court judge incorrectly found both sets of claims time-barred.