Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Neborsky v. Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:13-cv-02307
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
January 27, 2015
Embattled Aerospace Co. Head Wins Stay Of Shareholder Suit
A California federal judge on Monday paused a proposed shareholder class action against aerospace technology company Valley Forge Composite Technologies Inc., providing breathing room for a co-founder to fight charges stemming from allegedly illegal microcircuit sales to Hong Kong and China and participate in the company's bankruptcy proceedings.
-
July 30, 2014
Valley Forge Can't Dodge Class Action Over Illegal Exports
A California federal judge on Tuesday declined to dismiss a proposed shareholder class action against aerospace technology company Valley Forge Composite Technologies Inc. over its alleged failure to disclose illegal exports, three months after tossing a prior complaint due to inadequate pleading.
-
April 29, 2014
Valley Forge Wins Dismissal Of Illegal Export Class Action
A California federal judge on Monday tossed a putative shareholder class action against aerospace technology company Valley Forge Composite Technologies Inc. over its alleged failure to disclose illegal exports, saying the plaintiff didn't plead sufficient facts to explain why certain company statements were false or misleading.
-
January 21, 2014
Valley Forge Exec Knocks Investor's Illegal Export Suit
A co-founder of aerospace technology company Valley Forge Composite Technologies Inc. asked a California federal court Friday to toss a putative shareholder class action over its failure to disclose alleged illegal exports, claiming the suit's "puzzle piece" allegations fall flat.
-
September 25, 2013
Aerospace Co. Failed To Disclose Illegal Exports, Suit Says
Aerospace technology company Valley Forge Composite Technologies Inc. was hit with a proposed class action Wednesday by an investor who claims Valley Forge shareholders suffered losses when it was revealed that the company's primary source of revenue was its allegedly illegal exports of military semiconductors to Hong Kong.