Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
United States of America et al v. Celgene Corporation
Case Number:
2:10-cv-03165
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baute Crochetiere
- Bienert Katzman
- Bleichmar Fonti
- Gilbert & Sackman
- Glaser Weil
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Guttman Buschner
- Jones Day
- Keller Rohrback
- Nelson & Fraenkel
- Richard A. Harpootlian PA
- Sidley Austin
- Wexler Boley
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 14, 2017
DOJ Fights Whistleblower 'Windfall' In $280M FCA Deal
The U.S. Department of Justice told a California federal court Monday not to award a whistleblower $78 million of a $280 million settlement for her work in prosecuting a False Claims Act suit against Celgene Corp. over the alleged promotion of off-label uses for two cancer drugs, saying $65 million is enough.
-
July 25, 2017
Celgene To Pay $280M To End Off-Label Cancer Drug FCA Suit
Celgene Corp. has agreed to shell out $280 million to end a False Claims Act suit launched in California by a whistleblower who accused the drug company of promoting off-label uses for two cancer drugs, federal prosecutors announced on Tuesday.
-
January 31, 2017
Celgene Says 9th Circ. Ruling Means $40B FCA Suit Must Go
Celgene on Monday urged a California federal judge to reconsider his refusal to throw out a $40 billion False Claims Act suit accusing the pharmaceutical company of overcharging Medicare and Medicaid for cancer drugs, arguing that a recent Ninth Circuit ruling requires the court to apply a legal standard the relator cannot satisfy.
-
October 13, 2016
Escobar Supports Nixing $40B FCA Suit, Celgene Says
A trio of rulings based on the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Escobar decision in June show the government's continued reimbursement for cancer drugs Thalomid and Revlimid render a $40 billion False Claims Act suit against their maker Celgene immaterial, the pharmaceutical company told a California federal judge Wednesday.
-
September 27, 2016
Sales Rep Wants Docs Public In $40B Celgene FCA Row
Celgene Corp. hasn't proven that documents it wants to seal in a $40 billion False Claims Act suit over off-label promotion of the cancer drugs Thalomid and Revlimid would be harmful if released, especially as some of them are already public, a whistleblower told a California federal court Monday.
-
September 07, 2016
Celgene Knocks Feds' Support Of $40B Off-Label FCA Suit
The federal government's statement supporting a whistleblower's $40 billion False Claims Act suit against Celgene Corp. over the off-label promotion of cancer drugs Thalomid and Revlimid doesn't dismantle the company's arguments for dismissal because there's still no evidence of wrongdoing, Celgene told a California federal court Tuesday.
-
August 30, 2016
Celgene Battles $40B FCA Suit Over Off-Label Promos
Celgene Corp. on Monday pressed a California federal judge to end a whistleblower's $40 billion False Claims Act suit over off-label promotion of cancer drugs Thalomid and Revlimid, asserting that government officials knew about off-label uses and didn't object.
-
October 07, 2015
Celgene Trying To Skirt $700M In FCA Claims, Relator Says
A whistleblower on Wednesday blasted Celgene Corp.'s bid to exclude evidence in a False Claims Act suit over alleged off-label marketing of two cancer drugs, telling a California federal court the pharmaceutical company was simply trying to evade $700 million in damages owed to several states and the federal government.
-
October 06, 2015
Celgene Can't Limit Claims In FCA Off-Label Marketing Row
A California federal judge on Tuesday denied a bid made by Celgene Corp. to halve the time period covered by a whistleblower's False Claims Act suit over alleged off-label marketing of cancer drugs Thalomid and Revlimid and related kickbacks to doctors.
-
August 25, 2015
Celgene Says High Court Ruling Limits Length Of FCA Suit
The time period allowed in a whistleblower's False Claims Act suit against Celgene Corp. should be cut in half following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that a wartime pause on the expiration of government fraud claims does not apply to civil fraud cases, the company told a California federal court Monday.