Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Langan v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Case Number:
3:13-cv-01471
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 18, 2018
$2.4M Settlement Reached In J&J 'Natural' Baby Wash Suit
A woman suing Johnson & Johnson for allegedly misleading consumers by putting “natural” labels on its baby wash has asked a Connecticut federal court to approve a $2.4 million settlement that would also certify a multistate class of baby wash buyers, calling the deal “an excellent result.”
-
June 01, 2017
J&J Seeks Pause In 'Natural' Baby Wash Suit
Johnson & Johnson on Thursday asked a Connecticut federal judge to halt all proceedings in a deceptive labeling suit while it awaits a ruling from the Second Circuit on its appeal of the court's decision to certify a class of baby wash buyers who claim the company's "natural" labeling is misleading.
-
March 14, 2017
Class Certified In 'Natural' Baby Wash Case Against J&J
A Connecticut federal judge on Monday certified a class of buyers of Johnson & Johnson baby wash in one of two deceptive marketing suits over the company's labeling of certain sunscreen and baby wash products as "natural," while also rejecting both sides' attempts to end the dispute before trial.
-
November 19, 2015
J&J, Conn. Woman Spar Over 'Natural' Baby Wash Labels
A Connecticut woman leading a proposed class of Johnson & Johnson "natural" Aveeno baby wash buyers told a Connecticut federal court on Wednesday that the facts show that the labels are misleading to reasonable consumers.
-
September 22, 2015
J&J Fights Class Cert. In 'Natural' Baby Wash False Ad Row
Johnson & Johnson fought certification of a proposed class of "natural" Aveeno baby wash buyers allegedly charged a premium though the soaps contained chemical ingredients, telling a Connecticut federal court Monday that the class members cannot prove they were deceived into paying a higher price.
-
August 04, 2015
Class Cert. Sought In J&J 'Natural' Baby Wash False Ad Suit
A woman who claims Johnson & Johnson charged consumers more for its Aveeno brand baby bath products by labeling them "natural" asked a Connecticut federal judge to certify a class of consumers who bought the baby wash on Monday.
-
January 27, 2014
J&J Urges FDA Deference In Baby Wash False Ad Action
Johnson & Johnson on Friday sought the dismissal of a federal class action claiming the company's Aveeno brand baby wash formula is falsely advertised as "natural," arguing that cosmetic labeling is the exclusive bailiwick of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.