Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
In re JPMorgan Chase Derivative Litigation
Case Number:
2:13-cv-02414
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bottini & Bottini
- Cotchett Pitre
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Dreyer Babich
- Gibson Dunn
- Hagens Berman
- Jenkins Kayayan
- Kabateck LLP
- Miller Pitt
- Morgan Lewis
- Rimac Martin
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 24, 2014
JPMorgan Derivative Suit Over RMBS Practices Gets Quashed
A California federal judge on Thursday dismissed a shareholder derivative lawsuit against the top brass at JPMorgan Chase & Co. over the bank's residential mortgage-backed securities business that led to a $13 billion settlement with the government, saying the plaintiffs haven't properly pled claims of false statements and self-dealing.
-
November 20, 2013
$13B JPMorgan Deal Leads To New Investor Suit In Calif.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its top executives were hit with a lawsuit in California federal court on Wednesday, by a shareholder who said that the execs harmed the company through subprime mortgage practices and that a recent $13 billion settlement showed the "true extent and seriousness of the misconduct."