Shuxin Li et al v. Jack J. Qin et al

  1. December 15, 2015

    Customers Lose Cert. Bid In Lead-Laced Supplement Row

    A group of customers accusing a nutritional supplement company of selling pills laced with lead in an alleged pyramid scheme lost their bid at class certification Monday when a California federal judge found the Chinese-based class members may not "fully comprehend" notices about the proceedings.

  2. November 17, 2015

    Buyers Say Supplement Co. Can't Block Pyramid Scheme Cert.

    Consumers accusing a nutritional supplement company of selling pills laced with lead in an alleged pyramid scheme told a California federal judge Monday that the proposed class action asks a common question of whether the company ran an illegal endless chain scheme, thus the group should be certified.

  3. July 28, 2015

    Locke Lord Booted From Supplement False Ad Class Action

    A California federal judge on Tuesday said Locke Lord LLP was not adequate class counsel in a suit accusing a nutritional supplement company of selling pills laced with high levels of lead in a pyramid scheme, saying a related malpractice suit against predecessor firm Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP has created a conflict.

  4. July 20, 2015

    Locke Lord Faces DQ Threat In Health Pill False Ad Suit

    A California federal judge on Monday said she is considering disqualifying Locke Lord LLP from representing a putative class accusing a nutritional supplement company of selling pills laced with high levels of lead, saying she's "not confident the class is being well-represented" in the suit.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!