Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Shuxin Li et al v. Jack J. Qin et al
Case Number:
2:13-cv-08832
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Edwards Wildman
- Freeman Mathis
- Howarth & Smith
- Locke Lord
- Pryor Cashman
- Sallah Astarita
- Scheper Kim
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 15, 2015
Customers Lose Cert. Bid In Lead-Laced Supplement Row
A group of customers accusing a nutritional supplement company of selling pills laced with lead in an alleged pyramid scheme lost their bid at class certification Monday when a California federal judge found the Chinese-based class members may not "fully comprehend" notices about the proceedings.
-
November 17, 2015
Buyers Say Supplement Co. Can't Block Pyramid Scheme Cert.
Consumers accusing a nutritional supplement company of selling pills laced with lead in an alleged pyramid scheme told a California federal judge Monday that the proposed class action asks a common question of whether the company ran an illegal endless chain scheme, thus the group should be certified.
-
July 28, 2015
Locke Lord Booted From Supplement False Ad Class Action
A California federal judge on Tuesday said Locke Lord LLP was not adequate class counsel in a suit accusing a nutritional supplement company of selling pills laced with high levels of lead in a pyramid scheme, saying a related malpractice suit against predecessor firm Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP has created a conflict.
-
July 20, 2015
Locke Lord Faces DQ Threat In Health Pill False Ad Suit
A California federal judge on Monday said she is considering disqualifying Locke Lord LLP from representing a putative class accusing a nutritional supplement company of selling pills laced with high levels of lead, saying she's "not confident the class is being well-represented" in the suit.