Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Ebert et al v. General Mills, Inc.
Case Number:
0:13-cv-03341
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Blackwell Burke PA
- Hellmuth & Johnson
- Husch Blackwell
- Norton Rose
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Siegel Brill
- Varga Berger
- Zimmerman Reed
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 07, 2015
5 Environmental Class Actions Attorneys Need To Track
From a novel effort to hold a banana grower accountable for environmental damage abroad to more traditional but still controversial claims over alleged contamination from a Superfund site at people's homes, experts say there are five interesting environmental class actions to keep an eye on.
-
February 27, 2015
Property Owners Win Cert. In General Mills Superfund Action
A Minnesota federal judge on Friday certified a class of property owners who accuse General Mills Inc. of allowing carcinogens from a Superfund site to seep into a nearby Minneapolis neighborhood, saying the plaintiffs all sought the same remedy for same alleged damages.
-
September 05, 2014
General Mills Loses Bid To Dodge Superfund Class Action
A Minnesota federal judge on Thursday refused to throw out a proposed class action accusing General Mills Inc. of allowing carcinogens from a Superfund site to seep into a nearby residential area, finding the plaintiffs showed they face a threat of future harm from continued exposure to the chemicals.