Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Ultratec, Inc. et al v. Sorenson Communications, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:14-cv-00066
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Akin Gump
- Baker Botts
- Boardman & Clark
- Foley & Lardner
- Jenner & Block
- Maschoff Brennan
- Quarles & Brady
- Sheppard Mullin
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 03, 2016
Judge Kills $5M Phone Caption Verdict, Rules Patent Obvious
A Wisconsin federal judge on Friday tossed out a $5.4 million jury verdict awarded to text telecommunications Ultratec Inc. last year over a closed-captioned telephone system patent when he found in favor of defendant Sorenson Communications Inc. that the patent is invalid and obvious.
-
October 08, 2015
Jury Awards $5M Verdict In Closed-Caption Phone Patent Row
A jury granted Ultratec Inc. a $5.4 million damages judgment for intellectual property infringement in Wisconsin federal court Wednesday, days after rejecting Sorenson Communications Inc.'s argument that three claims in a closed-captioned telephone system patent were obvious.
-
October 06, 2015
Judge Axes Willfulness In Closed-Caption Phone Patent Row
A Wisconsin federal judge ruled Tuesday that if Sorenson Communications Inc. infringed a closed-captioned telephone system patent held by Ultratec Inc., it did not do so willfully, a day after a jury rejected Sorenson's argument that the three claims at issue were obvious.