Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Oplus Technologies, Ltd. v. VIZIO, Inc.
Case Number:
14-1297
Court:
Nature of Suit:
830 Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 20, 2015
Fed. Circ. Rebuke To Fuel Heated Disputes On Attys' Fees
The Federal Circuit's recent ruling that a district judge was wrong to not award attorneys' fees to Vizio Inc. in a patent case involving litigation misconduct by the opposing side provides useful guidance on how litigants can secure fees, but it may spark bitter fights in future cases, attorneys say.
-
April 10, 2015
Fed. Circ. Revives Vizio Fee Bid In 'Vexatious' IP Case
The Federal Circuit ruled Friday that a California federal judge abused her discretion by not awarding Vizio Inc. attorneys' fees after it prevailed in a patent suit by Oplus Technologies Ltd. and the judge found that Oplus and its Niro Haller & Niro Ltd. attorneys engaged in "vexatious" litigation misconduct.