Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
The UPS Store, Inc. et al v. Hagan et al
Case Number:
1:14-cv-01210
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 02, 2017
Remaining Counterclaim In UPS Trademark Suit Gets Tossed
A New York federal judge closed the book Wednesday on a trademark infringement suit brought by The UPS Store Inc. against two franchise-owning brothers in Manhattan, saying the brothers lack standing to keep the dispute alive with their sole counterclaim of false advertising.
-
September 12, 2016
UPS Franchisees Say Morrison & Foerster Ruined 'Key' Docs
UPS franchisees who have been ordered to pay $1 million to the delivery company for trademark infringement urged a New York federal court Friday to sanction UPS and its Morrison & Foerster LLP counsel, alleging they destroyed “key” evidence requested by the franchisees and then failed to disclose the destruction.
-
April 06, 2016
Franchisees Ordered To Pay UPS $1M In Trademark Suit
UPS franchisees and their stores were ordered Tuesday to pay the shipping giant more than $1 million in the company's trademark infringement suit against them, after a New York federal judge found they violated their franchise and contract carrier agreements.
-
December 21, 2015
UPS Store Owner Can't Defend Franchise Breach, Court Hears
UPS asked a New York federal judge Friday to rule franchisees violated their contract with the shipping giant, saying they had conceded all legally permissible defenses in the trademark suit and could not excuse their noncompliance with the franchise contract.
-
March 27, 2015
BigLaw On Notice After Judge Scolds Firms For Bad Writing
A New York federal judge's recent rebuke of two BigLaw firms over pleadings he found overly long and redundant was no doubt embarrassing, but experts say lawyers are risking more than just a judicial tongue-lashing when they fail to keep their filings short and sweet.
-
March 26, 2015
Judge Reams Out BigLaw Firms For Lengthy Filings
A New York federal judge this week unleashed a tirade against Reed Smith LLP, Morrison & Foerster LLP and two smaller firms, threatening sanctions over what he called oversized filings "brimming" with "irrelevant and redundant" allegations in a trademark suit brought by UPS Store Inc. against a franchisee.