Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Greenfield et al v. Paloian et al
Case Number:
1:14-cv-01583
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 25, 2014
Seyfarth Shaw Dodges Some Claims Over Law360 Comments
An Illinois federal judge ruled Monday that a Seyfarth Shaw LLP partner did not violate a gag order by discussing a restaurant company's bankruptcy in a Law360 piece because the comments were made outside his official trustee role — but the ruling may merit an immediate appeal, the judge said.
-
August 18, 2014
Seyfarth Aims To Toss Suit Over Disclosure In Law360 Article
Seyfarth Shaw LLP on Monday asked an Illinois federal judge to throw out a suit accusing one of its partners of defaming the former owners of a defunct restaurant company and breaching a settlement by disclosing confidential information about the company's bankruptcy in an interview with Law360.